Supreme Court declines to hear Justice Karnan's request to stay arrange

New Delhi, Jun 7 Calcutta High Court judge C S Karnan, evading arrest since May 9, today neglected to get help from the Supreme Court, which declined to hear his request looking for a stay on its request granting him a six-month imprison term for scorn of court.

Justice Karnan's insight specified the matter before a vacation bench containing Justices Ashok Bhushan and Deepak Gupta, which declined to interfere with the request guiding the West Bengal police to arrest him.

Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, speaking to Justice Karnan, told the seat that the high court judge was qualified for know why he was sentenced scorn for court by a seven-judge seat headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar.

"I am looking for just a remain. I had made a demand to the CJI to take up the matter. Equity Karnan, as different prosecutors, is qualified for get no less than a request from the court," he said.

The detailed verdict of the May 9 arrange had not been made accessible till date, he submitted.

The bench, be that as it may, said it couldn't hear the matter as the request was passed by an special bench of seven judges.

"The request was passed by the special bench. We can't state anything," the seat stated, including, "You ask these inquiries to the special bench."

To this, Nedumpara said there ought to be no less than a stay on the apex court's request till his supplication for review of the May 9 request was taken up for hearing.

"Nothing has occurred in the past one month. You sit tight for three or four more weeks and go to the special bench.
We can't help you. Whatever will be done can't avoid being finished by the special bench. We can't do it," the beach said.

The apex court had before declined to list and hear Justice Karnan's supplication looking for a review of the May 9 arrange after it was held as "not viable" by the court registry.

On May 12, Justice Karnan, whom the West Bengal police is searching for, had moved the apex court for help, saying neither one of the high courts, nor their judges, were "subordinate" to it.

"The solicitor, a judge of the High Court of Calcutta, is not under any disciplinary locale of either the CJI or the seat of seven judges constituted by the CJI, as in the moment case," the request said.

He looked for a review of the apex court arrange granting him six months' detainment, saying he couldn't be held liable of scorn of court.

Equity Karnan said the Contempt of Courts Act was a "cathartic statute which had a place with the Dark Ages, the period of investigation and torment, particular from the established Roman Law which constitutes the establishment of present day law".

He additionally looked for a stay on every single "further continuing" compliant with the May 9 arrange.